All official European Union website addresses are in the europa.eu domain.
See all EU institutions and bodiesDo something for our planet, print this page only if needed. Even a small action can make an enormous difference when millions of people do it!
Indicator Assessment
[1] Emissions data reported by EU Member States under NECD is used for comparison with NECD ceilings, and data reported under CLRTAP is used for all other calculations unless otherwise stated.
EEA-33 ammonia emissions have decreased by 25% between 1990 and 2011.
In general, the EU-28 have made excellent progress in reducing emissions of ammonia and out of the 28 Member States with emission ceilings set under the NECD 24 reported 2011 emissions that were below the level of their respective 2010 ceilings. In order to meet their continuing obligation under the NECD the remaining countries require further reductions in emissions as follows: Croatia 19%, Finland 17%, Spain 7% and Germany 2%. As indicated in Fig. 2, Denmark reported 2011 emissions under CLRTAP that were above the level of their NECD ceiling, however emissions reported under NECD were lower than their 2010 ceiling.
Finland reported emissions for 2011 that were significantly higher than their NECD ceiling and, although emissions reported under CLRTAP reduced by 6% between 1990 and 2000, their emissions have remained largely stable since 2000. Conversely, ammonia emissions in Spain have risen by around 14% since 1990, although a reduction equivalent to 5% of 1990 emissions has been reported from 2000 to 2011.
Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey are not members of the European Union and hence have no emission ceilings set under the NECD. Norway and Switzerland have ratified the UNECE LRTAP Convention's Gothenburg Protocol, requiring them to reduce their emissions to the agreed ceiling specified in the protocol by 2010. Liechtenstein has also signed, but not ratified the protocol. While Switzerland reported 2011 emissions below the level of their 2010 ceiling under the Gothenburg Protocol, emissions in 2011 for Liechtenstein and Norway were above the level of their 2010 ceiling. Norway's emissions have remained fairly constant throughout 1990-2011, whereas Liechtenstein's emissions have risen significantly between 2000 and 2009, however, a 42% reduction in emissions was reported between 2009 and 2011.
The revision of the National Emission Ceilings Directive 2001/81/EC (NECD) is part of the implementation of the Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution. The proposal to amend the NECD is still under preparation and should set emission ceilings to be respected by 2020 for the four already regulated substances (NOX, NMVOC, SOX and NH3), as well as for the primary emissions of PM2.5. A revision of the Gothenburg protocol was published in June 2012, and proposed percentage emission reductions from 2005 levels to be met by 2020 for the four already regulated substances and primary emissions of PM2.5. Existing emission ceilings for 2010 have been extended to 2020 such that all countries have additional obligations to maintain emission levels below their 2010 ceilings, or to further reduce emissions if they have not yet met these ceilings.
Fifteen of the EU-28 have already met the 2020 targets proposed under the Gothenburg protocol, and all but six of the remaining countries are on track to reduce emissions to their ceiling by or before 2020. Of these countries, however, only Estonia and Finland reported 2011 emissions which were more than 5% over the linear target path to their 2020 target.
The agricultural sector remains the major source of NH3 emissions; despite emissions falling by 26% since 1990, agriculture contributed 96% of total emissions in 1990, and 94% in 2011.
These emissions derive mainly from the decomposition of urea in animal wastes and uric acid in poultry wastes. Emissions depend on the animal species, age, weight, diet, housing systems, waste management and storage techniques. The majority of the reduction in emissions is due to the combination of reduced livestock numbers across Europe (especially cattle) and the lower use of nitrogenous fertilisers. NH3 emissions have also declined in EEA-33 countries outside the European Union between 1990 and 2011. Again, this is primarily due to reductions which have occurred in the agricultural sector as a result of decreasing animal numbers.
Emissions from road transport, though relatively small, have risen from 1990 levels as a result of the increasing use of three-way catalytic converters in the vehicle fleet; these release NH3 as a result of an unwanted reaction involving hydrogen, which reduces NO to NH3. However emissions have fallen since 2000 and are projected to fall in the future as the second generation of catalysts, which emit lower levels of NH3 than the first generation catalysts, penetrate the vehicle fleet.
ktonnes (1000 tonnes)
A number of policies have been implemented within Europe that either directly or indirectly act to reduce emissions of NH3. These include:
Apart from the NECD and Gothenburg Protocol and the IPPC Directive, there is currently no other EU legislation proposed or in force specifically aimed at reducing ammonia emissions. However, several regulatory instruments have influenced EU emissions of ammonia from the agriculture sector since 1990, such as:
These measures have had the indirect effect of changing agricultural practices across the EU, and have, for instance, led to a reduced use of nitrogenous fertilisers and to an overall decrease in cattle numbers, both of which affect the levels of ammonia emissions. The reforms of CAP, and specifically the removal of the link between farm production and payments, has also resulted in reduced livestock numbers across the EU-15 and hence also will have indirectly contributed to the decrease in ammonia emissions observed.
Emissions of NH3 are covered by the EU National Emission Ceilings Directive (NECD) (2001/81/EC) and the Gothenburg protocol under the United Nations Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP Convention) (UNECE 1999). The NECD generally involves slightly stricter emission reduction targets than the Gothenburg Protocol for EU-15 countries for the period 1990-2010. The Gothenburg Protocol entered into force on 17 May 2005, after ratification by 16 countries early in 2005.The 2012 revision to the Gothenburg protocol proposed emission reduction targets for 2020 relative to 2005 reported emissions for all EU-27 member states, and some EEA-32 non-EU member states.
Table: 2010 NH3 ceilings under the NEC Directive and the Gothenburg Protocol (kt)
Country |
2010 NECD |
2010 CLRTAP Gothenburg Protocol ceilings |
2020 CLRTAP Gothenburg Protocol ceilings |
Austria | 66 | 66 | 62 |
Belgium | 74 | 74 | 70 |
Bulgaria | 108 | 108 | 56 |
Cyprus | 9 | N/A | 5 |
Czech Republic | 80 | 101 | 64 |
Denmark | 69 | 69 | 63 |
Estonia | 29 | N/A | 10 |
Finland | 31 | 31 | 31 |
France | 780 | 780 | 634 |
Germany | 550 | 550 | 545 |
Greece | 73 | 73 | 63 |
Hungary | 90 | 90 | 72 |
Iceland* | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Ireland | 116 | 116 | 108 |
Italy | 419 | 419 | 395 |
Latvia | 44 | 44 | 15 |
Liechtenstein | N/A | 0.15 | N/A |
Lithuania | 84 | 84 | 35 |
Luxembourg | 7 | 7 | 5 |
Malta | 3 | N/A | 2 |
Netherlands | 128 | 128 | 122 |
Norway | N/A | 23 | 21 |
Poland | 468 | 468 | 267 |
Portugal | 90 | 108 | 47 |
Romania | 210 | 210 | 173 |
Slovakia | 39 | 39 | 24 |
Slovenia | 20 | 20 | 17 |
Spain | 353 | 353 | 357 |
Switzerland | N/A | 63 | 59 |
Sweden | 57 | 57 | 47 |
Turkey* | N/A | N/A | N/A |
United Kingdom | 297 | 297 | 283 |
* Iceland and Turkey do not have a ceiling under either the NEC Directive or the Gothenburg protocol.
This indicator is based on officially reported national total and sectoral emissions to EEA and UNECE/EMEP (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/Cooperative programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long-range transmission of air pollutants in Europe) Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP Convention), submission 2011. For the EU-27 Member States, the data used is consistent with the emissions data reported by the EU in its annual submission to the LRTAP Convention.
Recommended methodologies for emission inventory estimation are compiled in the EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook, (EMEP/EEA, 2009). Base data are available from the EEA Data Service (http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/dataservice/metadetails.asp?id=1096) and the EMEP web site (http://www.ceip.at/). Where necessary, gaps in reported data are filled by the European Topic Centre/EEA using simple interpolation techniques (see below). The final gap-filled data used in this indicator is available from the EEA Data Service (http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/PivotApp/pivot.aspx?pivotid=478)
Base data, reported in the UNECE/EMEP Nomenclature for Reporting (NFR) sector format, is aggregated into the following EEA sector codes to obtain a consistent reporting format across all countries and pollutants:
The following table shows the conversion of Nomenclature for Reporting (NFR) sector codes used for reporting by countries into EEA sector codes:
EEA classification |
Non-GHGs (NFR) |
|
National totals |
National total |
|
Energy production and distribution |
1A1, 1A3e, 1B |
|
Energy use in industry |
1A2 |
|
Road Transport |
1A3b |
|
Non-road transport (non-road mobile machinery) |
1A3 (excl. 1A3b) |
|
Industrial processes |
2 |
|
Solvent and product use |
3 |
|
Agriculture |
4 |
|
Waste |
6 |
|
Commercial, institutional and households |
1A4ai, 1A4aii, 1A4bi, 1A4bii, 1A4ci, 1A4cii, 1A5a, 1A5b |
|
Other |
7 |
|
An improved gap-filling methodology was implemented in 2010 that enables a complete time series trend for the main air pollutants (eg NOX, SOX, NMVOC, NH3 and CO) to be compiled. In cases where countries did not report emissions for any year, it meant that gap-filling could not be applied. For these pollutants, therefore, the aggregated data are not yet complete and are likely to underestimate true emissions. Further methodological details of the gap-filling procedure are provided in section 1.4.2 'Data gaps and gap-filling' of the European Union emission inventory report 1990–2009 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP).
NH3 emission estimates in Europe are more uncertain than those for NOX, SO2 and NMVOCs due largely to the diverse nature of major agricultural sources. It is estimated that they are around ±30% (EMEP, 2009). The trend is likely to be more accurate than the individual absolute annual values - the annual values are not independent of each other.
Overall scoring: (1-3, 1=no major problems, 3=major reservations)
This indicator is regularly updated by EEA and is used in state of the environment assessments. The uncertainties related to methodology and data sets are therefore of importance. Any uncertainties involved in the calculation and in the data sets need to be accurately communicated in the assessment, to prevent erroneous messages influencing policy actions or processes.
For references, please go to https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/eea-32-ammonia-nh3-emissions-1/assessment-4 or scan the QR code.
PDF generated on 14 Mar 2025, 07:47 PM
Engineered by: EEA Web Team
Software updated on 26 September 2023 08:13 from version 23.8.18
Software version: EEA Plone KGS 23.9.14
Document Actions
Share with others